MASOCHISM: An Alternative Intimacy
by Roy F. Baumeister, Ph.D.
How could someone enjoy being tied up and spanked? If you
like whips and chains, does that mean you’re crazy?
New research findings have changed our understanding of sexual masochism. Up until recently, psychology took a very dim view
of S&M. Psychologists thought that masochists were mentally ill, probably dangerous individuals full of guilt. But a completely
different picture has emerged in the last decade.
It is now clear that most masochists live normal, well-adjusted lives. Apart from their sex lives, they are pretty much like
anyone else. Masochism is not a sign of being sick or maladjusted. Masochism is certainly unusual, statistically speaking.
Strange? Yes, probably. Weird? Maybe. But sick? No.
Most theories about masochism derive from Freud’s views. Freud was puzzled by masochism and basically had no idea what
it was. He tossed out a few speculations, which others have taken to heart. But his ideas about masochism are probably inaccurate.
For example, Freudian-an theories of masochism are always talking about guilt. But none of the recent studies have found much
evidence of guilt. Sex guilt, in particular, is absent. Most masochists tend to be sexually liberated.
Why, then, do people do it? The appeal of masochism is in its
effects on the mind. Masochism is a powerful means of escape--escape from everyday life, from problems and worries, from who
you are most of the time. Masochism stops the world. It allows you to live, to feel, to play, and to enjoy in a way that is
far removed from the rest of life.
Central to this is the effect of masochism on the self. Your identity is basically a concept of who you are. It relates you
to the past and future, to other people, to your work and family, and to society at large. Identity brings in all your relationships,
your plans and ambitions, your projects and goals, and so on. Masochism knocks all of that out of your mind. In masochism
you become first and fore-most a body. The past and future, beyond the immediate scene, vanish from the mind. Your focus is
here and now, on sensation.
In some cases the escape is carried a step further: The masochist becomes someone new. In the fantasy scene, the masochist
may adopt a new role (of slave), develop a new personality, even change from male to female. (It is much rarer for female
masochists to become male during their scenes.) When your old, everyday identity is swept away, there is room for a new one
to be created in fantasy, to replace it.
Consider how this works. The three main features of masochism are pain, bondage or loss of control, and humiliation or embarrassment.
Start with the
last of the three. Normally, people want to avoid embarrassment or humiliating experiences. People want to have high self
esteem--to think well of themselves, to have other people think well of them. People want to be admired, to be successful,
to be famous, to be looked up to. Your normal identity is based on a certain amount of respect and dignity.
But masochism deliberately strips away respect and
dignity. The masochist is unable to maintain the normal identity, because it is incompatible with typical situations. A respectable
woman is not sup-posed to lie naked and spread-eagled on a table while well-dressed men look at her. Respectable men are not
supposed to wear dog collars and lick someone’s boots. Politicians, for example, have unusually high rates of masochism,
probably because politicians are forced by their jobs to maintain such gargantuan egos. Masochism may enable them to stop
being their overblown selves for a little while.
Second, consider bondage and other forms of losing control. Normally, people seek control. People want power, they want to
know what is going to happen to them, they want freedom, they want to have choices and options, and so forth. People want
to make up their own minds and run their own lives. The quest for control is one of the most universal psycho-logical principles.
A big part of the self is devoted to gaining and keeping control.
But masochism erases this aspect of the self. The masochist may submit to being tied up or blindfolded. The masochist is told
what to do and what not to do. During a scene, the masochist may not be allowed to have an orgasm or even go to the bathroom
without permission. Masochism forces you to be passive, and that blots out a major part of the self.
And then there’s pain. How could someone like
pain? In fact, it turns out that most masochists don’t really like the pain. The sensation itself is unpleasant--it
hurts. But pain has powerful effects on the mind. Pain takes your mind off other things. It focuses attention here and now.
You might be worried about meeting a deadline or paying the rent, you might be planning next year’s work or remembering
last year’s successes and failures. But when the dominant partner takes the whip to your derriere, those thoughts are
likely to vanish. You forget about being a home-owner, a decision-maker, a sales manager, a wife, an engineer. During the
whipping, you become just a body.
The effect of masochism is often described as liberating. Reading these descriptions, on wonders: How can it be liberating
to be put in chains? But the masochist is liberated from his or her own identity. The exhilaration that masochists describe
is produced partly by this removal of who you are. All your normal roles, ways of acting, your ideas of who you are, the games
you normally play with people--all these abruptly stop. All you are is your body. Or else you can fantasize about becoming
someone new.
Isn’t this part of sexual enjoyment for anyone? Why would someone need to use whips and chains, since normal sex produces
an escape? The answer to this is that normal, straight, “vanilla” sex isn’t always powerful enough to produce
the escape. In fact, enjoyment of standard sex sometimes depends on getting your mind off other problems and hassles, but
sex alone isn’t enough to bring this about.
Consider what happens in sex therapy. Many people go to sex therapists because they aren’t enjoying sex. They don’t
get aroused, or they don’t have orgasms, and they want help. Sex therapy tries to find ways of enhancing their sexual
response.
Sex therapy
since Masters and Johnson has been heavily based on getting the person’s mind off of himself, off of worries and problems
and distractions, and focused onto immediate sensations. Sex therapists try to get their patients to forget themselves, to
shed their egos along with their underwear. For many patients, that’s tough to do. Masochism is a powerful means of
achieving the same effect. Masochism forces you to shed your ego and forget yourself, because your actions simply don’t
fit your normal identity.
That is not to say that sex therapists use S&M to stimulate their patients. But they do a surprising number of things
that are similar. Consider some of the following. Sex therapists try to stimulate what they call the “sensate focus”--attending
merely to sensations. They are talking about pleasant skin contact, but pain certainly brings about an intense “sensate
focus” just as well if not faster. Sex therapists focus on treating the couple together, and masochists too, are heavily
oriented toward intimate relationships and partners. Sex therapists create isolation from the everyday world, such as by having
the couple stay at a motel and break telephone contact with home and office. Masochists create a scene that is radically cut
off from their everyday lives.
Some practices of sex therapy have an especially strong resemblance to S&M. Sex therapists will have the person assume
a very passive posture. For example, if the man has trouble keeping an erection, they’ll tell the woman to be on top
and to take care of inserting the penis into her. Obviously, masochism likewise puts the person in an extremely passive role,
including being on the bottom during sex. Another factor is that sex therapists sometimes forbid the couple to have intercourse
or orgasm during early stages of therapy, so they can get used to physical playing without the pressure of intercourse. Masochists
often desire similar structures of restrictions and permissions.
The point of all this is that masochism resembles what sex therapists do to increase sexual response. That may be part of
the explanation of the sexual appeal of masochism. People who want a sexual boost may be drawn to it. Probably this includes
at least two groups of people. First, those who don’t respond easily may like masochism because it brings their responses
up to normal. Second, people whose normal responses are fine but who want really intense experiences may like masochism. For
them, it may be a means of producing stronger sexual feelings than they can achieve in more conventional ways.
Of course, the attractions of masochism go beyond
the desire for a sexual boost. Seeing masochism as a way of escaping from our identity is a good way to place it in context.
Many other activities in modern life blot out the world and the everyday aspects of self. These include alcohol and drug use,
meditation, absorbing hobbies and intense sports such as hang gliding or windsurfing. Many people even find that jogging or
watching television produces a kind of trance that takes their mind off their concerns. Masochism is just an unusually powerful
member of this group of escapist pastimes.
Is masochism a form of love or of hate? There has been a lot of debate on this, but both sides are wrong. Masochism has nothing
to do with hate. And it is not quite a form of love, although it offers an alternative form of intimacy.
Masochism doesn’t necessarily involve love.
It is possible to engage in S&M with someone you’re not in love with. Nor does masochism make love redundant: People
seem to prefer to do it with people they love.
What’s clear, though, is that masochism produces an intense bond of intimacy between two people, even if it’s
only temporary. The masochist submerges his or her will, personality even identity, in the dominant partner. The importance
of intimacy can be seen in sexual fantasies. Masochistic fantasies are much more likely than other sexual fantasies to involve
long-term relationships, stable partners and intimates or lovers. (This conclusion is based on statistical comparison of masochistic
versus other sexual fantasies.) Masochists are heavily relationship-oriented.
Masochism is thus not the same as love, but it offers
an emotional and passionate feeling of closeness that is similar. I think the best way to view masochism is as an alternative
intimacy. Masochism can be enjoyed without love, because intimacy is usually rewarding. Or can it be employed within a love
relationship, to add a new dimension of relating to your loved one.
Although the experts are just beginning to form this new way of understanding masochism, don’t expect society to change
quickly. There are a lot of entrenched prejudices, and attitudes change very slowly. Also, masochists haven’t been very
forward about seeking tolerance, understanding and acceptance.
Probably the best analogy is with homosexuality. For a long time, psychologists regarded homosexuality as a form of mental
illness. Partly this was because clinical psychologists only see people who come to them for treatment. If you only see unhappy,
neurotic homosexuals, it is easy to conclude that all homosexuals are unhappy and neurotic. It took lots of research findings
plus the gay liberation movement to convince people that that view was mistaken.
Masochism lags far behind homosexuality in public
understanding, let alone tolerance. Clinical psychologists have only seen unhappy, neurotic masochists, so many of them think
that all masochists are unhappy and neurotic. Research evidence to the contrary has just started to appear in the last ten
years or so. And there is no S&M liberation movement to gain public favor.
If you are a masochist, or if someone close to you is, the
main thing is not to worry that there’s something wrong with you. There are probably a couple million other Americans
with the same desires, and the vast majority of them are healthy and well-adjusted. But don’t expect society at large
to make it easy for you. It will take a small miracle for society to revise its prejudices, and miracles take time.
Dr. Roy F. Baumeister is a professor
of psychology at Case Western Reserve University, in Ohio.